Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753695AbYJBJ0u (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Oct 2008 05:26:50 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752893AbYJBJ0n (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Oct 2008 05:26:43 -0400 Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:50565 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752848AbYJBJ0n (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Oct 2008 05:26:43 -0400 Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 11:26:30 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Willy Tarreau Cc: Linux-Kernel Subject: Re: Typo bug [Re: Linux 2.6.27-rc8] Message-ID: <20081002092630.GB9456@elte.hu> References: <20080930094346.307ef1e5@werewolf.home> <20080930075553.GB20241@elte.hu> <20080930100252.22bb4df5@werewolf.home> <20080930080546.GD20241@elte.hu> <20081001213328.GB7115@tilt.dandreoli.com> <20081002052746.GI24654@1wt.eu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20081002052746.GI24654@1wt.eu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.5 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.5 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.3 -1.5 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1431 Lines: 37 * Willy Tarreau wrote: > On Wed, Oct 01, 2008 at 11:33:28PM +0200, Domenico Andreoli wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 10:05:46AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > > > * J.A. Magall?n wrote: > > > > > > > > heh. Could you send a patch with a changelog please? > > > > > > > > Here it goes...I hope its right. > > > > > > applied to tip/x86/urgent, thanks! > > > > Ingo, why did you require a patch? Was not it really more simple and > > easy for everyone to write it yourself? Since I am sure it was not only > > a laziness matter (really?), I am very curious to know the reason. > > I see two things : > - preserve authorship of the code > - "laziness" as you call it, is the only way to scale for a maintainer. yeah, correct. Also, i asked (not required) J.A. Magall?n whether he could send a patch - if he didnt (no time, etc.) i'd have fixed it myself (crediting him in the changelog). But it's also a general principle: maintainers dont 'own' the code in any way and there should be no assymetry in the ability to modify the code. So if people are willing to fix bugs they notice, i prefer that far more than me doing it. Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/