Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S290033AbSA3QhK>; Wed, 30 Jan 2002 11:37:10 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S290015AbSA3Qfr>; Wed, 30 Jan 2002 11:35:47 -0500
Received: from mail.scram.de ([195.226.127.117]:62921 "EHLO mail.scram.de")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id <S290025AbSA3Qew>;
	Wed, 30 Jan 2002 11:34:52 -0500
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 17:34:12 +0100 (CET)
From: Jochen Friedrich <jochen@scram.de>
To: Larry McVoy <lm@bitmover.com>
cc: Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>, Jeff Garzik <garzik@havoc.gtf.org>,
        Rob Landley <landley@trommello.org>,
        Miles Lane <miles@megapathdsl.net>, Chris Ricker <kaboom@gatech.edu>,
        World Domination Now! <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: A modest proposal -- We need a patch penguin
In-Reply-To: <20020130080642.E18381@work.bitmover.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.NEB.4.33.0201301731530.16245-100000@www2.scram.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Hi Larry,

> with the difference being that BK has an optional way of wrapping
> them up in uuencode (or whatever) so that mailers don't stomp on them.

isn't that just the same as sending them as attchment? And isn't that
discouraged?

Cheers,
--jochen

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/