Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 30 Jan 2002 11:51:07 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 30 Jan 2002 11:49:39 -0500 Received: from garrincha.netbank.com.br ([200.203.199.88]:11529 "HELO netbank.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Wed, 30 Jan 2002 11:48:55 -0500 Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 14:47:26 -0200 (BRST) From: Rik van Riel X-X-Sender: To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Larry McVoy , Tom Rini , Linus Torvalds , Daniel Phillips , Alexander Viro , Rob Landley , linux-kernel Subject: Re: A modest proposal -- We need a patch penguin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: X-spambait: aardvark@kernelnewbies.org X-spammeplease: aardvark@nl.linux.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 30 Jan 2002, Ingo Molnar wrote: > On Wed, 30 Jan 2002, Larry McVoy wrote: > > > How much of the out order stuff goes away if you could send changes > > out of order as long as they did not overlap (touch the same files)? > > could this be made: 'as long as they do not touch the same lines of > code, taking 3 lines of context into account'? (ie. unified diff > definition of 'collisions' context.) That would be _wonderful_ and fix the last bitkeeper problem I'm having once in a while. cheers, Rik -- "Linux holds advantages over the single-vendor commercial OS" -- Microsoft's "Competing with Linux" document http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/