Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754371AbYJCADO (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Oct 2008 20:03:14 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753338AbYJCAC7 (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Oct 2008 20:02:59 -0400 Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com ([71.74.56.125]:60224 "EHLO hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753337AbYJCAC7 (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Oct 2008 20:02:59 -0400 Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 20:02:57 -0400 (EDT) From: Steven Rostedt X-X-Sender: rostedt@gandalf.stny.rr.com To: Chris Friesen cc: Ingo Molnar , Linux kernel , Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [bug report] sched: stop_machine() usage causes load balancer to misbehave In-Reply-To: <48E55FE5.40108@nortel.com> Message-ID: References: <48E55FE5.40108@nortel.com> User-Agent: Alpine 1.10 (DEB 962 2008-03-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 921 Lines: 25 On Thu, 2 Oct 2008, Chris Friesen wrote: > I mentioned before that ftrace (specifically the ftraced daemon) seems to be > interfering with the load balancer. After some experimenting, it appears that > any regular calls to stop_machine() will end up confusing the load balancer. > > As an experiment, I disabled ftraced (which would normally result in correct > load balancing) but added a single kernel thread which simply runs the > following loop, where "chrisd2" is a dummy function. Chris, Thanks for looking into this. I don't have an answer for your question, but I'll work harder to get the MCOUNT_REC working in PPC. Does this happen with x86 too? -- Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/