Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 30 Jan 2002 12:23:56 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 30 Jan 2002 12:22:11 -0500 Received: from neon-gw-l3.transmeta.com ([63.209.4.196]:60168 "EHLO neon-gw.transmeta.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 30 Jan 2002 12:21:55 -0500 Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 09:20:58 -0800 (PST) From: Linus Torvalds To: Alan Cox cc: Alexander Viro , Daniel Phillips , , Rob Landley , Subject: Re: A modest proposal -- We need a patch penguin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 30 Jan 2002, Alan Cox wrote: > > So if someone you trusted actually started batching up small fixes and > sending you things like > > "37 random documentation updates - no code changed", "11 patches to fix > kmalloc checks", "maintainers updates to 6 network drivers" > > that would work sanely ? Yes. That would take a whole lot of load off me - load I currently handle by just not sweating the small stuff, and concentrating on the things I think are important. > The other related question is device driver implementation stuff (not interfaces > and abstractions). You don't seem to check that much anyway, or have any taste > in device drivers 8) so should that be part of the small fixing job ? I think it has some of the same issues, but I really would prefer to have it in a separate batch. Quite frankly, this is a large part of what you did.. Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/