Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 30 Jan 2002 13:05:48 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 30 Jan 2002 13:04:30 -0500 Received: from panic.ohr.gatech.edu ([130.207.47.194]:36310 "HELO gtf.org") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Wed, 30 Jan 2002 13:03:34 -0500 Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 13:03:32 -0500 From: Jeff Garzik To: Jochen Friedrich Cc: Larry McVoy , Roman Zippel , Rob Landley , Miles Lane , Chris Ricker , World Domination Now! Subject: Re: A modest proposal -- We need a patch penguin Message-ID: <20020130130332.B28741@havoc.gtf.org> In-Reply-To: <20020130080642.E18381@work.bitmover.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from jochen@scram.de on Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 05:34:12PM +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 05:34:12PM +0100, Jochen Friedrich wrote: > > with the difference being that BK has an optional way of wrapping > > them up in uuencode (or whatever) so that mailers don't stomp on them. > > isn't that just the same as sending them as attchment? And isn't that > discouraged? gcc developers love that uuencoded stuff for large files it seems, but it's not big in l-k land... plaintext patches are preferred. The main requirement is that the patch is NOT obscured by base64 or uuencoding. Jeff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/