Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 30 Jan 2002 15:57:37 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 30 Jan 2002 15:57:27 -0500 Received: from [212.176.242.127] ([212.176.242.127]:6921 "EHLO penguin.aktivist.ru") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 30 Jan 2002 15:57:15 -0500 Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 23:57:02 +0300 From: Wartan Hachaturow To: Mark Hahn Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Console driver behaviour? Message-ID: <20020130235702.A23358@penguin.aktivist.ru> In-Reply-To: <20020130162536.GA12421@mojo.spb.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 03:09:07PM -0500, Mark Hahn wrote: > > any way to catch the situation? I've thought that open should > > return ENODEV in these cases, but it doesn't.. > > screen, perhaps? this is most definitely not a linux-kernel question. This is most probably a console driver question, which is kernel-specific ;) I wonder what should console driver say when it doesn't have a real physical console behind it. IMO, this should be a ENODEV case, or some other way to determine programmatically that this situation takes place. So, I am trying to find someone familar with console driver on linux-kernel (since this driver doesn't have a specific maintainer). If I am wrong, and linux-kernel is not relevant, sorry.. -- Regards, Wartan. echo "Your stdio isn't very std." -- Larry Wall in Configure from the perl distribution - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/