Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755291AbYJFR0j (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Oct 2008 13:26:39 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753428AbYJFR0b (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Oct 2008 13:26:31 -0400 Received: from E23SMTP03.au.ibm.com ([202.81.18.172]:39006 "EHLO e23smtp03.au.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752993AbYJFR0a (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Oct 2008 13:26:30 -0400 Message-ID: <48EA4A3C.3030106@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2008 22:56:20 +0530 From: Balbir Singh Reply-To: balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com Organization: IBM User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (X11/20080925) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki , Andrew Morton CC: "linux-mm@kvack.org" , LKML , "nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp" Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] memcg update v6 (for review and discuss) References: <20081001165233.404c8b9c.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <20081002180229.5bb94727.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> In-Reply-To: <20081002180229.5bb94727.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2077 Lines: 62 KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote: > On Wed, 1 Oct 2008 16:52:33 +0900 > KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote: > >> This series is update from v5. >> >> easy 4 patches are already posted as ready-to-go-series. >> >> This is need-more-discuss set. >> >> Includes following 6 patches. (reduced from v5). >> The whole series are reordered. >> >> [1/6] make page_cgroup->flags to be atomic. >> [2/6] allocate all page_cgroup at boot. >> [3/6] rewrite charge path by charge/commit/cancel >> [4/6] new force_empty and move_account >> [5/6] lazy lru free >> [6/6] lazy lru add. >> >> Patch [3/6] and [4/6] are totally rewritten. >> Races in Patch [6/6] is fixed....I think. >> >> Patch [1-4] seems to be big but there is no complicated ops. >> Patch [5-6] is more racy. Check-by-regression-test is necessary. >> (Of course, I does some.) >> >> If ready-to-go-series goes, next is patch 1 and 2. >> > > No terrible bugs until now on my test. > > My current idea for next week is following. > (I may have to wait until the end of next merge window. If so, > I'll wait and maintain this set.) > > - post ready-to-go set again. > - post 1/6 and 2/6 as may-ready-to-go set. I don't chagnge order of these. > - reflects comments for 3/6. > patch 3/6 adds new functions. So, please tell me if you have better idea > about new functions. > - check logic for 4/6. > - 5/6 and 6/6 may need some more comments in codes. > - no new additional ones. Kamezawa-San, Andrew, I think patches 1 and 2 are ready to go. Andrew they remove the cgroup member from struct page and will help reduce the overhead for distros that care about 32 bit systems and also help with performance (in my runs so far). I would recommend pushing 1 and 2 right away to -mm followed by the other performance improvements. Comments? -- Balbir -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/