Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 27 Nov 2000 10:23:15 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 27 Nov 2000 10:23:05 -0500 Received: from lightning.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.1]:61038 "EHLO the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 27 Nov 2000 10:22:52 -0500 Subject: Re: [Oops] apic, smp and k6 To: Torsten.Duwe@caldera.de Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2000 14:52:51 +0000 (GMT) Cc: aj@dungeon.inka.de (Andreas Jellinghaus), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <14882.27508.534457.187156@ns.caldera.de> from "Torsten Duwe" at Nov 27, 2000 03:11:00 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL1] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: From: Alan Cox Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > while now with an appropriate patch. Now Christoph Hellwig has identifi= > ed a > simpler solution (updated for -test11 by me): > > --- linux/arch/i386/kernel/setup.c~ Fri Jul 7 04:42:06 2000 > +++ linux/arch/i386/kernel/setup.c Tue Jul 18 19:22:48 2000 > @@ -785,7 +785,8 @@ > /* > * get boot-time SMP configuration: > */ > - if (smp_found_config) > + if (smp_found_config && /* try only if the cpu has a local apic */ > + test_bit(X86_FEATURE_APIC, boot_cpu_data.x86_capability)) > get_smp_config(); This patch unfortunately does break some real setups, since it is legal to have non APIC on the CPU but an APIC as an addon chip. > I think Alan has a similar thing in his test11-ac* series. Maciej Rozycki provided a much better test, that from reports so far seems to be working - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/