Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753492AbYJGOg1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Oct 2008 10:36:27 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751552AbYJGOgQ (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Oct 2008 10:36:16 -0400 Received: from e8.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.138]:37778 "EHLO e8.ny.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751303AbYJGOgP (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Oct 2008 10:36:15 -0400 Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 07:36:11 -0700 From: "Paul E. McKenney" To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: David Miller , dada1@cosmosbay.com, minyard@acm.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, shemminger@vyatta.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] Convert the UDP hash lock to RCU Message-ID: <20081007143611.GB6384@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reply-To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com References: <20081006185026.GA10383@minyard.local> <48EA8197.6080502@cosmosbay.com> <20081006.144002.56418911.davem@davemloft.net> <1223368290.26330.10.camel@lappy.programming.kicks-ass.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1223368290.26330.10.camel@lappy.programming.kicks-ass.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15+20070412 (2007-04-11) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1324 Lines: 33 On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 10:31:30AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Mon, 2008-10-06 at 14:40 -0700, David Miller wrote: > > From: Eric Dumazet > > Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2008 23:22:31 +0200 > > > > > Me wondering what impact this synchronize_rcu() can have on mono-threaded > > > VOIP applications using lot of UDP sockets. What is the maximum delay of > > > this function ? > > > > The cost is enormous, we really can't use it here. > > > > I have a patch that did top-level socket destruction using RCU, > > and that didn't use synchronize_rcu(), and that killed connection > > rates by up to %20. > > Did you ever figure out why you lost those 20% ? > > > I can only imagine what the cost would be if I had to add such a call > > in there. > > Yeah, sync_rcu() is rediculously expensive, at best 3 jiffies IIRC. I could make it -much- faster, but at the expense of -serious- CPU overhead. Still, might be useful during boot time (when the system can't do anything useful anyway) to accelerate getting data structures initialized. Thanx, Paul -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/