Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] integrity
From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
       Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
       Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>,
       David Safford <safford@watson.ibm.com>,
       Serge Hallyn <serue@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.1.10.0810081553090.13169@tundra.namei.org>
References: <cover.1223401603.git.zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
	 <alpine.LRH.1.10.0810081553090.13169@tundra.namei.org>
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2008 10:19:44 -0400
Message-Id: <1223475584.3103.8.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1109
Lines: 33

On Wed, 2008-10-08 at 15:56 +1100, James Morris wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Oct 2008, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> 
> >   The integrity-TPM-internal-kernel-interface.patch prereqs:
> >         TPM-update-char-dev-BKL-pushdown.patch
> >         TPM-num_opens-to-is_open-variable-change.patch
> >         TPM-rcu-locking.patch
> >         TPM-addition-of-pnp-remove.patch
> >         TPM-Fixed-tpm_release-timing.patch
> 
> Where are these patches?
> 
> i.e. are they in a tree?  If so, which one?  If not, they need to be 
> posted in this series.
> 
> 
> 
> - James

The TPM patches have not, as yet, been picked up.

These TPM patches are base TPM changes, not really related to the
integrity patches and certainly not dependent them.  However the reverse
is not true.  The integrity-tpm-internal-kernel-interface patch is
dependent on, at least, the TPM-rcu-locking patch.

Mimi

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/