Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758497AbYJILf5 (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Oct 2008 07:35:57 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755095AbYJILfu (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Oct 2008 07:35:50 -0400 Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:59853 "EHLO mx2.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754736AbYJILft (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Oct 2008 07:35:49 -0400 Organization: Red Hat UK Ltd. Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United Kingdom. Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903 From: David Howells In-Reply-To: <1223497370.8195.97.camel@brick> References: <1223497370.8195.97.camel@brick> <1223450773.8195.80.camel@brick> <19824.1223464566@redhat.com> To: Harvey Harrison Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, Russell King , Andrew Morton , LKML Subject: Re: FRV/ARM unaligned access question Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2008 12:35:17 +0100 Message-ID: <3315.1223552117@redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 863 Lines: 24 Harvey Harrison wrote: > Probably smaller as now the le values aren't being byteswapped anymore, > only the native endianess can use the struct version. Care to look at > the kernel size with the following instead? For some unknown reason, the data segment shrank by four bytes. The text segment stayed the same though: warthog>size vmlinux text data bss dec hex filename 2207804 66584 150189 2424577 24ff01 vmlinux I would guess that in that kernel almost nothing uses LE unalignment. The kernel works, so feel free to add my Acked-by to the patch. David -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/