Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 30 Jan 2002 22:18:01 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 30 Jan 2002 22:17:51 -0500 Received: from panic.ohr.gatech.edu ([130.207.47.194]:62179 "HELO gtf.org") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Wed, 30 Jan 2002 22:17:38 -0500 Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 22:17:36 -0500 From: Jeff Garzik To: Daniel Phillips Cc: Wakko Warner , Ro0tSiEgE , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Kernel -- GCC Version Message-ID: <20020130221736.D22862@havoc.gtf.org> In-Reply-To: <055301c1a9f3$af5f73e0$ed00000a@citrix.bjstuff.com> <20020130203726.B28451@animx.eu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from phillips@bonn-fries.net on Thu, Jan 31, 2002 at 03:54:03AM +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jan 31, 2002 at 03:54:03AM +0100, Daniel Phillips wrote: > On January 31, 2002 02:37 am, Wakko Warner wrote: > > > I've looked on kernel.org, in the kernel sources, it its not really clear, > > > from what I would see. If someone could tell me exactly what are the best > > > and/or what Linus uses versions of gcc, etc. for compiling the different > > > kernels? (2.0/2.2/2.4/2.5) Thanks! > > > > I don't recommend gcc 3.0 for kernel compiles as I had problems with it on > > the system I tried it on. > > What problem exactly? I've had zero problems in the last 5 months. Seconded, I've been using x86 custom-built kernels with gcc 3.0.3 for a few weeks, and IIRC the MDK kernel rpm boots for me on alpha too. Jeff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/