Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754840AbYJJBcn (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Oct 2008 21:32:43 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753769AbYJJBce (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Oct 2008 21:32:34 -0400 Received: from E23SMTP06.au.ibm.com ([202.81.18.175]:52073 "EHLO e23smtp06.au.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753648AbYJJBcd (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Oct 2008 21:32:33 -0400 Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 07:06:39 +0530 From: Vaidyanathan Srinivasan To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Linux Kernel , Suresh B Siddha , Venkatesh Pallipadi , Ingo Molnar , Dipankar Sarma , Balbir Singh , Vatsa , Gautham R Shenoy , Andi Kleen , David Collier-Brown , Tim Connors , Max Krasnyansky Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/5] sched: modular find_busiest_group() Message-ID: <20081010013639.GA4045@dirshya.in.ibm.com> Reply-To: svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com Mail-Followup-To: Peter Zijlstra , Linux Kernel , Suresh B Siddha , Venkatesh Pallipadi , Ingo Molnar , Dipankar Sarma , Balbir Singh , Vatsa , Gautham R Shenoy , Andi Kleen , David Collier-Brown , Tim Connors , Max Krasnyansky References: <20081009120705.27010.12857.stgit@drishya.in.ibm.com> <1223561968.7382.42.camel@lappy.programming.kicks-ass.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1223561968.7382.42.camel@lappy.programming.kicks-ass.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1116 Lines: 31 * Peter Zijlstra [2008-10-09 16:19:28]: > > Hi, > > I've looked over the last posting, but so far failed to respond :/ > > While I like the clean-up, I'm atm a bit reluctant to apply, as I'm > trying to rework the sched_domain stuff and the HT balancing and I'm not > quite sure how this will interact with your patches. Hi Peter, Thanks for reviewing the changes. I just wanted an initial feedback before I spend too much time on this approach. I am interested in HT balancing stuff and I wanted to study the behaviour and improve the power saving heuristics there as well. > I hope to share my proposal (in talk - no patches yet) soonish (this > weekend, early next week) so that we can discuss it. I am looking forward to it. We can definitely rework the implementation to seamlessly take on power saving heuristics. Thanks, Vaidy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/