Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754090AbYJJCnX (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Oct 2008 22:43:23 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751539AbYJJCmv (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Oct 2008 22:42:51 -0400 Received: from sh.osrg.net ([192.16.179.4]:49402 "EHLO sh.osrg.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750796AbYJJCmt (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Oct 2008 22:42:49 -0400 Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 11:40:56 +0900 To: yinghai@kernel.org Cc: grundler@parisc-linux.org, matthew@wil.cx, jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org, mingo@elte.hu, tglx@linutronix.de, hpa@zytor.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] pci: print out DMA mask info From: FUJITA Tomonori In-Reply-To: <48EE8E55.4000009@kernel.org> References: <86802c440810091451y4a3caceg1abaa75464c40a72@mail.gmail.com> <20081009225533.GB1914@colo.lackof.org> <48EE8E55.4000009@kernel.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20081010114003X.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1391 Lines: 27 On Thu, 09 Oct 2008 16:05:57 -0700 Yinghai Lu wrote: > Grant Grundler wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 09, 2008 at 02:51:32PM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote: > >> On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 2:35 PM, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > >>> Why's that interesting to the sysadmin of the machine? To the driver > >>> writer, certainly. But what's the use of it to the people using the > >>> machine? > > ... > >> make linux kernel act like black box as other os? > > > > I don't understand your reply. > > If someone thinks linux is a black box, printing this message won't help them. > > > could find out easily why some driver doesn't set dma mask correctly. > like why > qlogic qla2xxx only set consistent to 64bit, > emulex lpfc not set consistent to 64bit IIRC, except for one SGI architecture, coherent_dma_mask is meaningless, dma_mask is always equal to coherent_dma_mask. Lots of IOMMU implementations ignore coherent_dma_mask and use dma_mask for alloc_coherent(). Some drivers doesn't set up coherent_dma_mask. Theoretically, we need to fix this but it doesn't cause any problem. That's why nobody cares about it, I guess. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/