Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1761796AbYJJQHu (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Oct 2008 12:07:50 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756934AbYJJQHl (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Oct 2008 12:07:41 -0400 Received: from outbound-mail-122.bluehost.com ([67.222.38.22]:58924 "HELO outbound-mail-122.bluehost.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1753255AbYJJQHk (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Oct 2008 12:07:40 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=virtuousgeek.org; h=Received:From:To:Subject:Date:User-Agent:Cc:References:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Disposition:Message-Id:X-Identified-User; b=N3JMnfbKe2p2iPTBm8oejM6yy8Fwus/I1e8G9OunHrX4mHXze6QoERc5ZFAXGH/8TgqP44pOZSPzltU/u0bAnTvaF45Tbd8kb9vhCLFuVxL5pM3a1H8Thp4+LJSpykOU; From: Jesse Barnes To: "Vincent Legoll" Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI probing debug message uniformization Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 09:07:35 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 Cc: "Bjorn Helgaas" , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <4727185d0809291403w38422338p3ffe2a1c27c39939@mail.gmail.com> <200810031257.42457.bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> <4727185d0810031550l32592f7ep2d1d37f93be12874@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4727185d0810031550l32592f7ep2d1d37f93be12874@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200810100907.35798.jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> X-Identified-User: {642:box128.bluehost.com:virtuous:virtuousgeek.org} {sentby:smtp auth 75.111.27.49 authed with jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org} Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1832 Lines: 43 On Friday, October 3, 2008 3:50 pm Vincent Legoll wrote: > On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 8:57 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > It'll be easier for Jesse if you include the proper changelog again > > with just a 1-2 line sample of the changed messages. BTW, the "--" > > before your sig confused my mailer into not quoting the patch itself, > > hence the screwed up formatting below. > > The "-- " line is the start-of-.sig marker have I been taught in my > school days, I think they then spoke about netiquette... > > > dev_info() is exactly equivalent to dev_printk(KERN_INFO). I usually > > use dev_info(), though I'm a bit ambivalent because it's nice to be > > able to grep for "printk". > > I left dev_printk(KERN_INFO, ...) for grepability > > > Anyway, maybe you can correct the grammar > > of "enabled forcedly" to something like "you can enable with ..." when > > you re-post with the changelog. > > I've used "You can enable it back with", hoping the gramar is right > > > (Note that dev_dbg() is NOT exactly equivalent to dev_printk(KERN_DEBUG), > > so you can't change all of them. dev_printk(KERN_DEBUG) is always > > compiled in, while dev_dbg() is only compiled in when "DEBUG" is > > defined.) > > Thanks for the hint, for I may have jumped the gun on those "other" > cleanups ;-) > > So here is the new version cut'n'pasted from git-format-patch Can you respin against linux-next and send me a fresh copy? This one seems to have been corrupted somehow (sorry for the slow reply, it's been sitting in my 'to apply' mbox for awhile now). Thanks, Jesse -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/