Message-ID: <48EFC1BE.5010300@fr.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 22:57:34 +0200
From: Daniel Lezcano <dlezcano@fr.ibm.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080501)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Dave Hansen <dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
CC: Greg Kurz <gkurz@fr.ibm.com>, Oren Laadan <orenl@cs.columbia.edu>,
       Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, containers@lists.linux-foundation.org,
       arnd@arndb.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/2] Track in-kernel when we expect	checkpoint/restart
 to work
References: <20081009190405.13A253CB@kernel> <1223626834.8787.8.camel@localhost.localdomain> <48EF144D.1050906@fr.ibm.com> <20081010145934.GF11695@elte.hu> <48EF7211.2000303@cs.columbia.edu> <1223656489.10017.33.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1223656603.11830.50.camel@nimitz>
In-Reply-To: <1223656603.11830.50.camel@nimitz>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 664
Lines: 15

Dave Hansen wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-10-10 at 18:34 +0200, Greg Kurz wrote:
>> This flag is weak... testing it gives absolutly no hint whether the
>> checkpoint may succeed or not. As it is designed now, a user can only be
>> aware that checkpoint is *forever* denied. I agree that it's only useful
>> as a "flexible CR todo list".
> 
> Cool, so everyone agrees the patch is useful!

Yes, definitively. It is a good idea.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/