Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 31 Jan 2002 06:20:55 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 31 Jan 2002 06:20:46 -0500 Received: from [195.63.194.11] ([195.63.194.11]:45322 "EHLO mail.stock-world.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 31 Jan 2002 06:20:29 -0500 Message-ID: <3C592870.10206@evision-ventures.com> Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 12:20:16 +0100 From: Martin Dalecki User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.7) Gecko/20011226 X-Accept-Language: en-us, pl MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Christoph Hellwig CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@transmeta.com, axboe@suse.de Subject: Re: A modest proposal -- We need a patch penguin In-Reply-To: <200201291313.g0TDDd716906@ns.caldera.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Christoph Hellwig wrote: >Hi Martin, > >In article <3C568C52.2060707@evision-ventures.com> you wrote: > >>>One "patch penguin" scales no better than I do. In fact, I will claim >>>that most of them scale a whole lot worse. >>> >>Bla bla bla... Just tell how frequenty do I have to tell the world, that >>the read_ahead array is a write >>only variable inside the kernel and therefore not used at >>all?????!!!!!!!!!! >> > >It IS used. (hint: take a look at fs/hfs/file.c). > Right, but the usage there is semantically *invalid*. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/