Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932506AbYJKR5M (ORCPT ); Sat, 11 Oct 2008 13:57:12 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932415AbYJKR4x (ORCPT ); Sat, 11 Oct 2008 13:56:53 -0400 Received: from pasmtpb.tele.dk ([80.160.77.98]:43215 "EHLO pasmtpB.tele.dk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932402AbYJKR4w (ORCPT ); Sat, 11 Oct 2008 13:56:52 -0400 Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2008 19:56:16 +0200 From: Jens Axboe To: petkovbb@gmail.com Cc: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz , Robert Hancock , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] ide: locking improvements Message-ID: <20081011175615.GW19428@kernel.dk> References: <200810111645.27847.bzolnier@gmail.com> <20081011150532.GU19428@kernel.dk> <200810111756.37278.bzolnier@gmail.com> <20081011170610.GA7574@gollum.tnic> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20081011170610.GA7574@gollum.tnic> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1530 Lines: 34 On Sat, Oct 11 2008, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 05:56:37PM +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > > On Saturday 11 October 2008, Jens Axboe wrote: > > > On Sat, Oct 11 2008, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > > > > On Saturday 11 October 2008, Jens Axboe wrote: > > > > > On Sat, Oct 11 2008, Borislav Petkov wrote: > > [... ] > > Don't you just love it when all gets resolved peacefully and > everything is fine and dandy afterwards. I'm so happy we've > straightened that one out. Just a final quick note which by no means > is targetting to resparkle the discussion: I have another bug report, > hm, well :), but still, the machine is a 8-core AMD Dell box (with the > option of upgrading to 16 cores) which _is_ using ide-cd so, there are > some people using that code, after all :). I'm sure those people will > be happier when it scales to that many cores. > > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11498. Not to throw a monkey wrench, but I did add 'pushing data' to that IDE statement. There is of course lots of systems still with a parallel channel for things like atapi drives. But that is completely parallel to the initial argument, those don't care a rats ass about scalability. They care about it working, that is all. -- Jens Axboe -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/