Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932662AbYJKR7m (ORCPT ); Sat, 11 Oct 2008 13:59:42 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932585AbYJKR7Q (ORCPT ); Sat, 11 Oct 2008 13:59:16 -0400 Received: from earthlight.etchedpixels.co.uk ([81.2.110.250]:57528 "EHLO lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932570AbYJKR7O (ORCPT ); Sat, 11 Oct 2008 13:59:14 -0400 Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2008 18:58:21 +0100 From: Alan Cox To: 7eggert@gmx.de Cc: Adam Tla?ka , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@osdl.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] SIGWINCH problem with terminal apps still alive Message-ID: <20081011185821.0dab4c81@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.5.0 (GTK+ 2.12.12; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Organization: Red Hat UK Cyf., Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SL4 1TE, Y Deyrnas Gyfunol. Cofrestrwyd yng Nghymru a Lloegr o'r rhif cofrestru 3798903 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 564 Lines: 13 > Alan, do you agree? Or is it required to take both locks at the same time? > If it is, in which order? I don't agree. Please read the code more carefully. In paticular note that TIOCGWINSZ is driven off the tty side of any tty/pty pair. That we set the pty size termios bits is really a curiousity of history. Alan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/