Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 31 Jan 2002 08:01:07 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 31 Jan 2002 08:00:57 -0500 Received: from garrincha.netbank.com.br ([200.203.199.88]:58386 "HELO netbank.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Thu, 31 Jan 2002 08:00:42 -0500 Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 11:00:24 -0200 (BRST) From: Rik van Riel X-X-Sender: To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Larry McVoy , Eli Carter , Georg Nikodym , Ingo Molnar , Tom Rini , Daniel Phillips , Alexander Viro , Rob Landley , Linux Kernel List Subject: Re: A modest proposal -- We need a patch penguin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: X-spambait: aardvark@kernelnewbies.org X-spammeplease: aardvark@nl.linux.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 30 Jan 2002, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Wed, 30 Jan 2002, Larry McVoy wrote: > > > > And you just lost some useful information. > > No. If the useless crap ends up hiding the real points in the revision > history, getting rid of crud is _good_. Actually, allowing the deep merges to go past tags could be useful for dragging bugfixes between the 2.4 and 2.5 kernels ... ... but I think the 'dragging' analogy is something we'll want to keep here, not back merging across tags by default but _trying_ to do the backmerge on demand only, when the user wants to drag a changeset from 2.4 to 2.5. We could just have a revtool-like interface for that. regards, Rik -- "Linux holds advantages over the single-vendor commercial OS" -- Microsoft's "Competing with Linux" document http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/