Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756267AbYJLUjA (ORCPT ); Sun, 12 Oct 2008 16:39:00 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753762AbYJLUis (ORCPT ); Sun, 12 Oct 2008 16:38:48 -0400 Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.170]:12151 "EHLO ug-out-1314.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753666AbYJLUir (ORCPT ); Sun, 12 Oct 2008 16:38:47 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=wsYP1NlUPr4aTl4VkZZbYF8kRkHP3bJxl7gV0RjUM20E4gK3112jEJEOvy+qbkqNLb JEBnTmagGjJPJe7hhAF6j6FRCpTnWdlcVxo5LCKwqvj2I1ZG7hmlA90KZZ7IPfsL5rBN mBteuIUY83JnbrZGkZNLSYm2JIxoYaV0h2GWU= Message-ID: <524f69650810121338y4bd00ec2pd213f6d933209cbf@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 15:38:46 -0500 From: "Steve French" To: "Jeff Layton" Subject: Re: [linux-cifs-client] Fwd: [PATCH] Fix CIFS compilation with CONFIG_KEYS unset Cc: rjw@sisk.pl, "linux-cifs-client@lists.samba.org" , netdev@vger.kernel.org, cooldavid@cooldavid.org, "samba-technical@lists.samba.org" , "David Miller" , LKML In-Reply-To: <20081012161634.5e410c24@tleilax.poochiereds.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <200810121315.37203.rjw@sisk.pl> <524f69650810120640v41778375wf0a7662e773da26f@mail.gmail.com> <20081012095903.33427ee8@tleilax.poochiereds.net> <524f69650810120953t2ec8100cpdddc3ddfce0406d9@mail.gmail.com> <524f69650810120957t1a81f23lf3fd75fee78e72c3@mail.gmail.com> <20081012161634.5e410c24@tleilax.poochiereds.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 771 Lines: 21 On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 3:16 PM, Jeff Layton wrote: > It's your call, but if we're going to carry a temporary patch, then I'd > prefer to just carry the one that adds the empty key_revoke definition. > I don't think there's much benefit to changing the cifs code for this, > but I don't feel very strongly about it either way... > -- > Jeff Layton There are probably various CIFS_UPCALL related ifdefs that could be merged/shrunk - let's do this as a set later. -- Thanks, Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/