Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S291096AbSAaPBn>; Thu, 31 Jan 2002 10:01:43 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S291099AbSAaPBe>; Thu, 31 Jan 2002 10:01:34 -0500
Received: from smtpzilla1.xs4all.nl ([194.109.127.137]:45064 "EHLO
	smtpzilla1.xs4all.nl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S291097AbSAaPBU>; Thu, 31 Jan 2002 10:01:20 -0500
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 16:01:16 +0100 (CET)
From: Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>
X-X-Sender: <roman@serv>
To: Alexander Viro <viro@math.psu.edu>
cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Martin Dalecki <dalecki@evision-ventures.com>,
        Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>,
        Daniel Phillips <phillips@bonn-fries.net>,
        Rob Landley <landley@trommello.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: A modest proposal -- We need a patch penguin
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.21.0201310725540.15689-100000@weyl.math.psu.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0201311558400.16064-100000@serv>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Hi,

On Thu, 31 Jan 2002, Alexander Viro wrote:

> > 'old' architectures do not hinder development - they are separate, and
> > they have to update their stuff. (and i think the m68k port is used by
>
> ... unless they play silly buggers with the internals of VM.

As long as there is still someone who can respond to problems in the arch
part, I don't really think it's a problem, or was it?

bye, Roman

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/