Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 31 Jan 2002 11:02:24 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 31 Jan 2002 11:02:15 -0500 Received: from 12-224-37-81.client.attbi.com ([12.224.37.81]:40456 "HELO kroah.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Thu, 31 Jan 2002 11:01:58 -0500 Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 08:00:30 -0800 From: Greg KH To: Kent Yoder Cc: jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, marcelo@conectiva.com.br Subject: Re: [PATCH] IBM Lanstreamer bugfixes (round 2) Message-ID: <20020131160030.GA1343@kroah.com> In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.26i X-Operating-System: Linux 2.2.20 (i586) Reply-By: Thu, 03 Jan 2002 13:36:53 -0800 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, Very minor suggestion: On Thu, Jan 31, 2002 at 09:29:21AM -0600, Kent Yoder wrote: > + case IOCTL_SPIN_LOCK_TEST: > + printk("spin_lock() called.\n"); You should add the proper KERN_* level to all of the printk() calls in this ioctl function, as they do not seem to be protected with a #ifdef STREAMER_DEBUG, like other unclassified printk() calls in this driver are. thanks, greg k-h - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/