Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1761261AbYJMM2V (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Oct 2008 08:28:21 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755230AbYJMM2M (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Oct 2008 08:28:12 -0400 Received: from one.firstfloor.org ([213.235.205.2]:49838 "EHLO one.firstfloor.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756841AbYJMM2L (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Oct 2008 08:28:11 -0400 To: "Phil Endecott" Cc: "Linux Kernel Mailing List" Subject: Re: [PATCH] Mention Intel Atom in Kconfig.cpu From: Andi Kleen References: <1223895506638@dmwebmail.dmwebmail.chezphil.org> Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 14:28:06 +0200 In-Reply-To: <1223895506638@dmwebmail.dmwebmail.chezphil.org> (Phil Endecott's message of "Mon, 13 Oct 2008 11:58:26 +0100") Message-ID: <87zll8r86h.fsf@basil.nowhere.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.1008 (Gnus v5.10.8) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 494 Lines: 15 "Phil Endecott" writes: > Am I right in thinking that CONFIG_MCORE2 is the correct choice for an > Intel Atom? No, Atom is completely different from a Core2. Right now 586 or 686 is a reasonable choice. -Andi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/