Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759315AbYJMOxc (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Oct 2008 10:53:32 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755858AbYJMOxV (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Oct 2008 10:53:21 -0400 Received: from khc.piap.pl ([195.187.100.11]:43828 "EHLO khc.piap.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756166AbYJMOxU (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Oct 2008 10:53:20 -0400 To: Adrian Bunk Cc: David Miller , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Please pull - generic HDLC References: <20081012.144704.39192150.davem@davemloft.net> <20081013055356.GA29938@cs181140183.pp.htv.fi> From: Krzysztof Halasa Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 16:53:17 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20081013055356.GA29938@cs181140183.pp.htv.fi> (Adrian Bunk's message of "Mon\, 13 Oct 2008 08\:53\:56 +0300") Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 900 Lines: 23 Adrian Bunk writes: > The over 3 weeks old -next already contains mostly the same as the HDLC > tree contains now. > > The thing you two should sort out is why the tree ended up as an own > tree in -next instead of pull requests to David long ago. > > E.g. the netdev and wireless trees also don't go into -next, but instead > with frequent pull requests to David. I can't see any problem with this, is there any? I want the HDLC tree tested in next before it's merged upstream (= David's tree(s)). I don't want to push crap upstream first and only then try to fix it (though a bug still slips in sometimes). -- Krzysztof Halasa -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/