Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 31 Jan 2002 12:55:05 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 31 Jan 2002 12:54:55 -0500 Received: from ip68-3-104-241.ph.ph.cox.net ([68.3.104.241]:31397 "EHLO grok.yi.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 31 Jan 2002 12:54:41 -0500 Message-ID: <3C5984C9.20104@candelatech.com> Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 10:54:17 -0700 From: Ben Greear Organization: Candela Technologies User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.4) Gecko/20011019 Netscape6/6.2 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Robbert Kouprie CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: NIC lockup in 2.4.17 (SMP/APIC/Intel 82557) In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Robbert Kouprie wrote: > The box is an Abit BP6 with Dual Celerons 433 and 192 Mb RAM. No > PCI-Riser cards. It is connected at 100 Mbit full duplex to a 100 > Mbit switch. APIC is enabled. No kind of power management is enabled. The only lockup problems I have run into are connecting some eepro nics to a 10bt hub, and using (cheap arsed, it appears) PCI riser cards. I have heard of some SMP related issues, but nothing concrete, and I don't have any SMP systems personally. You could try the e100, but I have no idea if it will be better or worse for your particular problem. -- Ben Greear President of Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com ScryMUD: http://scry.wanfear.com http://scry.wanfear.com/~greear - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/