Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932121AbYJNHcV (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Oct 2008 03:32:21 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1760554AbYJNHac (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Oct 2008 03:30:32 -0400 Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.159]:10824 "EHLO fg-out-1718.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759027AbYJNHaa (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Oct 2008 03:30:30 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent:sender; b=ms3DTGksDxRiOOOM6QcyP03c0mSKu16XhdqdISmFfg//iIJQH8NkVXucKexTNYGzuQ 9VvExqCm8tPNHk5rNmzEE3Jr2nl4jz47mtkIoWRb+d4v62zxTcAQuj5GVfRlaJcUVkxB xqz0nQSS50Q4+HK3OHmt6NqYY6s/S9PWUQiCU= Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 10:30:33 +0300 From: Eduard - Gabriel Munteanu To: Tom Zanussi Cc: Pekka Enberg , jens.axboe@oracle.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PROBLEM] hard-lock with kmemtrace, relayfs, and splice Message-ID: <20081014073033.GA5284@localhost> References: <1223386477.28348.42.camel@penberg-laptop> <1223623191.8959.26.camel@penberg-laptop> <1223628687.8959.37.camel@penberg-laptop> <1223629803.8959.40.camel@penberg-laptop> <1223631723.8959.46.camel@penberg-laptop> <1223701131.7489.25.camel@charm-linux> <1223881068.31587.1.camel@penberg-laptop> <1223957031.10883.7.camel@charm-linux> <48F42A93.1040004@cs.helsinki.fi> <1223963208.10883.55.camel@charm-linux> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1223963208.10883.55.camel@charm-linux> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1589 Lines: 46 On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 12:46:47AM -0500, Tom Zanussi wrote: > Hi Pekka, > > On Tue, 2008-10-14 at 08:13 +0300, Pekka Enberg wrote: > > Hi Tom, > > > > Tom Zanussi wrote: > > > To me, that sounds like how it should work - if kmemtrace is disabled, > > > it shouldn't be logging anything, and that's in fact what I saw when > > > debugging this - it started out disabled and therefore nothing being > > > logged to relay (printks confirmed that). When I wrote 1 to the enabled > > > file, data started getting logged to relay and to the *.out files. > > > > > > So I don't know why the enabled state behaves the way it does, or if > > > it's unexpected, but that anyway doesn't seem like a relay problem to > > > me. > > > > Oh, right. Looking at kmemtraced.c, we never enable kmemtrace, just > > disable it (which doesn't make much sense). Bug in README or the code. > > Eduard? > > > > Btw, Tom, you can add my > > > > Tested-by: Pekka Enberg > > > > to your patch if you want. Are you going to send it to Andrew or do you > > want me to pick it up with rest of the kmemtrace patches? > > If you pick it up that would be fine with me. Here's my sob: > > Signed-off-by: Tom Zanussi > > Thanks, > > Tom > Great, this makes it go swifter. I'll commit the change to kmemtrace-user. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/