Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755920AbYJNVIq (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Oct 2008 17:08:46 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754162AbYJNVIb (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Oct 2008 17:08:31 -0400 Received: from tservice.net.ru ([195.178.208.66]:35431 "EHLO tservice.net.ru" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753097AbYJNVIa (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Oct 2008 17:08:30 -0400 Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 01:08:27 +0400 From: Evgeniy Polyakov To: Andreas Dilger Cc: Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Distributed storage release. Message-ID: <20081014210827.GA31312@2ka.mipt.ru> References: <20081006160034.GA611@2ka.mipt.ru> <20081012192419.fd8394c9.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20081013133850.GA13565@2ka.mipt.ru> <20081014155143.GM2009@webber.adilger.int> <20081014161256.GA22286@2ka.mipt.ru> <20081014203529.GW2009@webber.adilger.int> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20081014203529.GW2009@webber.adilger.int> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2266 Lines: 46 On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 02:35:29PM -0600, Andreas Dilger (adilger@sun.com) wrote: > > Like Scsi_Host and include/scsi/scsi_host.h? My favourite coding style > > standards! It has the same space issues I have, but my code does not use > > capital letters :) > > I totally agree - this is a sign that in the past the kernel didn't follow > the coding style closely enough and now we have a mishmash of code styles. > That doesn't mean that new code should also contribute to that mess, but > that old code should be cleaned up - as it is updated. Ext4 is a very new code :) There are several lines which exceed 80 columns, which are actually comments, just what was blamed by the checkpatch.pl only. Really, no one cares about them. > > I always wondered... I submit almost 5 thousands line of code and I'm > > blamed that I do not have or have too many spaces in several dozens of > > lines. Should I get it as kernel hackers can not say anything bad about > > project except amount of spaces? > > I was only commenting about your refusal to change the code style when > Andrew asked it of you. There are good reasons to have a standard code > style for large projects even if it isn't everyone's preferred style. That's what I meant :) Actually all other signs from The God of Checkpatch were sacrificed long ago, there are just several spaces and braces: let them be a small group of heathens at this religion time. Standards are great, but killing a child just because he or she is left-hander, is a bit crazy, don't you think? So it would be quite interesting to hear that (at least one) showstopper for inclusion is a number of spaces :) Of course this is stupid. Pointing to the ext4 with spaces is stupid. Taking care about what no one ever cares and make that to be a something significant is stupid. Making a religion out of checkpatch.pl output is actually great. As great as counting number of steps to the street corner and making that meaning of the life. Or at least a ground. -- Evgeniy Polyakov -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/