Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 10:05:21 +0100
From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: "Kaz Kylheku" <kkylheku@gmail.com>
Cc: "Chris Friesen" <cfriesen@nortel.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: GPL question: using large contiguous memory in proprietary
 driver.
Message-ID: <20081015100521.739277f2@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
In-Reply-To: <3f43f78b0810141623s4282f9eof87014d2dee17810@mail.gmail.com>
References: <3f43f78b0810141456r159d71e7h9763e50e7dbc0c51@mail.gmail.com>
	<48F5193B.1010601@nortel.com>
	<3f43f78b0810141623s4282f9eof87014d2dee17810@mail.gmail.com>
Organization: Red Hat UK Cyf., Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street,
 Windsor, Berkshire, SL4 1TE, Y Deyrnas Gyfunol. Cofrestrwyd yng Nghymru a
 Lloegr o'r rhif cofrestru 3798903
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 827
Lines: 19

> But thanks to the gracious tolerance of the kernel development
> community, such drivers are permitted to exist. That is the question:

Thats an interesting interpretation and not one I'd want to rely upon.

> setting aside GPL chapter and verse, could that tolerance extend
> to allow such a driver to get a piece of boot-time memory, and if so,
> what mechanism would be tolerated?

You should discuss such matters with your lawyer. What you are trying to
ask I think is a question about what constitutes an independant work, and
that is a legal not a technical question.

Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/