Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753544AbYJOJHe (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Oct 2008 05:07:34 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752056AbYJOJHZ (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Oct 2008 05:07:25 -0400 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:39577 "HELO mail.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1751096AbYJOJHY (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Oct 2008 05:07:24 -0400 X-Authenticated: #20450766 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+pDCh1seip+KBUUETtgTSnbhnxCbwfWY10jqGbSz ncks8axgS1k2Ca Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 11:07:27 +0200 (CEST) From: Guennadi Liakhovetski To: Magnus Damm cc: Adrian Bunk , Stefan Herbrechtsmeier , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , lethal@linux-sh.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, video4linux-list@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Magnus Damm Subject: Re: [PATCH] soc-camera: fix compile breakage on SH In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <20081014183936.GB4710@cs181140183.pp.htv.fi> <20081015033303.GC4710@cs181140183.pp.htv.fi> <20081015052026.GC20183@cs181140183.pp.htv.fi> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-FuHaFi: 0.6 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1923 Lines: 50 On Wed, 15 Oct 2008, Magnus Damm wrote: > Yeah, that one plus a patch for the smc91x platform data and another > one for mmc (which needs updating anyway). So maybe it's not such a > big deal. And I see your point with closing the window ASAP to do > damage control. Otoh I wonder how big difference it will be extending > the breakage window with one commit - there must be zillions of > commits in after the breakage already. So, let's close it ASAP. > Paul, any strong feelings regarding merging things though the SuperH tree? Hm, I think, soc_camera_platform parts would have to go through v4l tree. Unless we ask Andrew / Linus apply a fix directly to minimize the window, after you test it of course:-) > > Thanks, but no thanks:-) I cannot add your copyright, at least not without > > your explicit agreement (I think). So, I'd prefer you submit a patch for > > that. > > I wonder if it's a large enough bit sequence to actually copyright. =) > But sure, I'll do that. Good, thanks. > Is this .29 material, or will there be a second v4l round with trivial > driver changes for .28? > > I've already posted some vivi patches and two simple patches for the > sh_mobile_ceu driver - sorry about the timing - and i have one more > sh_mobile_ceu patch outstanding. Also, I think one of my coworkers may > post a soc_camera driver for ov772x chips soon too. > > Is there any chance that can get included in .28? I think there is still a chane, if we are fast enough. In any case I queued your sh_mobile_ceu patches, will try to push them on to Mauro latest this weekend. Thanks Guennadi --- Guennadi Liakhovetski, Ph.D. Freelance Open-Source Software Developer -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/