Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756537AbYJORu1 (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Oct 2008 13:50:27 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755578AbYJORt7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Oct 2008 13:49:59 -0400 Received: from fk-out-0910.google.com ([209.85.128.184]:15359 "EHLO fk-out-0910.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754210AbYJORt6 (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Oct 2008 13:49:58 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=V5w7V32XW5lDZeaF/21yKucrk8ajSkf+tMO5kzRbBnRmy4nxL2OMupdFdg6vGTygoK r2sPtFhX8Uw2jtL9MKg1ugMmOlRAuiSh2O8neGQ6aehfZWGwV8GGAo0nWFH7M8opevTR xvKfTeBX6eG6J/g4AAVtHQbUdIc2G/atK6CbY= Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 21:52:52 +0400 From: Alexey Dobriyan To: Andrew Morton Cc: Arjan van de Ven , torvalds@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu, Evgeniy Polyakov Subject: Re: [PATCH] fastboot: Introduce an asynchronous function call mechanism Message-ID: <20081015175252.GA10600@x200.localdomain> References: <20081012194427.2e21c22e@infradead.org> <20081015014117.faff3a61.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20081015075246.2e1610f3@infradead.org> <20081015095905.41219c9d.akpm@linux-foundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20081015095905.41219c9d.akpm@linux-foundation.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 786 Lines: 21 On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 09:59:05AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Wed, 15 Oct 2008 07:52:46 -0400 Arjan van de Ven wrote: > > > On Wed, 15 Oct 2008 01:41:17 -0700 > > Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > +static int async_active = 0; > > > > > > ? > > ok will add comment > > I was actually "?"ing at the "= 0". I thought that would be obvious > but it's whizzed past two people so far :( Is there evidence that some gccs will not add such variable to .bss? Because "= 0;" is more readable. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/