Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 31 Jan 2002 18:00:57 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 31 Jan 2002 18:00:48 -0500 Received: from pizda.ninka.net ([216.101.162.242]:6528 "EHLO pizda.ninka.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 31 Jan 2002 18:00:34 -0500 Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 14:59:04 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <20020131.145904.41634460.davem@redhat.com> To: vandrove@vc.cvut.cz Cc: torvalds@transmeta.com, garzik@havoc.gtf.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, paulus@samba.org, davidm@hpl.hp.com, ralf@gnu.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: crc32 and lib.a (was Re: [PATCH] nbd in 2.5.3 does not From: "David S. Miller" In-Reply-To: <20020131225306.GA23758@vana.vc.cvut.cz> In-Reply-To: <107F105A2B71@vcnet.vc.cvut.cz> <20020131153115.A5370@havoc.gtf.org> <20020131225306.GA23758@vana.vc.cvut.cz> X-Mailer: Mew version 2.1 on Emacs 21.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Petr Vandrovec Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 23:53:06 +0100 I'd like to ask architecture maintainers (especially ia64, PPC, Sparc and Sparc64 maintainers) for verification that my changes did not break anything... I tested only i386, but changes were obvious... I'll test this out up after Linus releases a pre-patch with this included. As a side note, this thing is so tiny (less than 4K on sparc64!) so why don't we just include it unconditionally instead of having all of this "turn it on for these drivers" stuff? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/