Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 31 Jan 2002 19:46:47 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 31 Jan 2002 19:46:37 -0500 Received: from rj.sgi.com ([204.94.215.100]:6638 "EHLO rj.sgi.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 31 Jan 2002 19:46:19 -0500 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.2 06/23/2000 with nmh-1.0.4 From: Keith Owens To: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC] x86 ELF bootable kernels/Linux booting Linux/LinuxBIOS In-Reply-To: Your message of "31 Jan 2002 16:36:27 PDT." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2002 11:46:09 +1100 Message-ID: <22967.1012524369@kao2.melbourne.sgi.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 31 Jan 2002 16:36:27 -0700, ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) wrote: >"Erik A. Hendriks" writes: >Sort of. The assumptions change per architecture. But I haven't >heard of an architecture where some addresses are not safe. NUMA boxes with discontiguous physical memory. You may not boot off node 0. Whichever node you boot from may not be able to see all of physical memory yet, the cross node directrories may not be set up. The boot node may not even have physical address 0. I don't say that these boxes exist yet but they are possible with discontiguous memory architectures. >Dynamic linking with relocation is nasty. I have some code in insmod that you can use ... Nasty is an understatement. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/