Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757219AbYJQAop (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Oct 2008 20:44:45 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753325AbYJQAoh (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Oct 2008 20:44:37 -0400 Received: from smtp124.sbc.mail.sp1.yahoo.com ([69.147.64.97]:40393 "HELO smtp124.sbc.mail.sp1.yahoo.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1753482AbYJQAog (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Oct 2008 20:44:36 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=pacbell.net; h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:From:To:Subject:Date:User-Agent:Cc:References:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Disposition:Message-Id; b=0D/eY5A1sf25cBA4IInW2mMSTHfkCsNukCZ8eR8k52MEj55LPwUAUIEGJbVcNlwYtGIGGJdm+VF27cYJ08kePiGstlD+Dw4bIquxmIHzZHZ46SL67UHEFZe2sR2osrKYMnGFwAgKtewhZYhs+vvSnhIqIciAPYDeOvLFx9n1HSw= ; X-YMail-OSG: pcvNxpQVM1nVGTmZi1U4nJRd.DQ.W2.OLvF03MlsvANAaGs8nKFr3Uj8As_diO3T5Lw89Uu_ub9jBkU3avK8SeZrC9781x0vktVxReEJIHl1HxEQTvOrPURjaDIOLseHm611iU0DmldueHOmY7pvwao2 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 From: David Brownell To: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [patch] gpiolib: fix oops in gpio_get_value_cansleep() Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 17:44:33 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9 Cc: avorontsov@ru.mvista.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@kernel.org References: <200810160845.22281.david-b@pacbell.net> <20081016161718.e05864da.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20081016161718.e05864da.akpm@linux-foundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200810161744.34005.david-b@pacbell.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 892 Lines: 28 On Thursday 16 October 2008, Andrew Morton wrote: > > From: David Brownell > > > > We can get the following oops from gpio_get_value_cansleep() > > when a GPIO controller doesn't provide a get() callback: > > We can, but do we? ;) I think it's unlikely without the sysfs interface. > iow: is this needed in any -stable release? The bug has been there since 2.6.25 but nobody else seems to have reported it. Is the general policy to fix all oopses that *could* appear? I'd send it for 2.6.27-stable, since that's got the sysfs hooks. And older kernels if bug likelihood isn't a major concern. - Dave -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/