Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754277AbYJQBxS (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Oct 2008 21:53:18 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751004AbYJQBxH (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Oct 2008 21:53:07 -0400 Received: from wf-out-1314.google.com ([209.85.200.174]:9472 "EHLO wf-out-1314.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750824AbYJQBxF (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Oct 2008 21:53:05 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=XJ8qyJGK9MwKjoV6KaR2RI6xOjWBvMjQ4UL+44wBWNLggvA2TGVyQ+fAFz3AE5i0nb Bfnl72MxesnpXLm65u75lLIKHaKdHd7TafEjLbMmEjBXyt1ADnMPMPB1JO+lgBsIdtiI zCIvT9iM2aNZu1qKw35Mhz96xeQrm760wPdEY= Message-ID: Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 09:53:04 +0800 From: "Dave Young" To: "Theodore Tso" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC] Kernel version numbering scheme change In-Reply-To: <20081016153512.GE12962@mit.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20081016002509.GA25868@kroah.com> <20081016142619.GA3756@tatooine.rebelbase.local> <20081016153512.GE12962@mit.edu> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1232 Lines: 36 On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 11:35 PM, Theodore Tso wrote: > On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 04:26:19PM +0200, markus reichelt wrote: >> Why not just keep it? It has worked so far, and from a strictly >> end-user point of view I cannot see any advantages at all with a new >> scheme. The ideas mentioned so far don't cut it either. > > I'd cast a vote for keeping it as well. "2.6" is actually a great > marker so that people know that it's highly likely the version number > is for the Linux kernel. Contrast "I'm running 2.6.27" versus "I'm > running 27" (huh, what does that mean?) or "I'm running the 27 kernel" > or "I'm running Linux kernel version 27" or worse yet "I'm running > 2008-03". Something like "2.6.27" is just easier to say, and less > prone to misunderstanding/confusion. > > Let's just leave things the way they are. Agree. Additionally, we can add some range to x.y.z such as: x: 1-9 y: 1-9 z: 1-30 so we can jumo to 2.7.1 after 2.6.30 -- Regards dave -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/