Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757588AbYJQVsp (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Oct 2008 17:48:45 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755165AbYJQVsM (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Oct 2008 17:48:12 -0400 Received: from kroah.org ([198.145.64.141]:56387 "EHLO coco.kroah.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752194AbYJQVsL (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Oct 2008 17:48:11 -0400 Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 14:44:49 -0700 From: Greg KH To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz Cc: Steven Noonan , Adrian Bunk , Linus Torvalds , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC] Kernel version numbering scheme change Message-ID: <20081017214449.GC3585@kroah.com> References: <20081016002509.GA25868@kroah.com> <20081017174657.GH2221@kroah.com> <200810172106.29154.bzolnier@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200810172106.29154.bzolnier@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1524 Lines: 35 On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 09:06:28PM +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > On Friday 17 October 2008, Greg KH wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 01:16:38AM -0700, Steven Noonan wrote: > > > I believe some of Adrian's concerns are valid. Userspace programs will > > > indeed break, largely because some depend on build-time and run-time > > > checks for the kernel version being >=2.6.0 or >=2.4.0 and so forth. I > > > suspect the best way to prove userspace breakage would be to make a > > > branch of the kernel with a new versioning scheme (8.10, 2008.10, > > > whatever) and use that as the installed kernel while building a Gentoo > > > system. I suspect you'd see massive breakage. > > > > That would be trivial for me to test, IFF we want to do something like > > this. > > > > But again, that's a technical thing, that can be solved _IFF_ we want to > > change things. > > > > And that's my point here, do we want to change the current numbering > > scheme as people have expressed annoyances of the current one. > > Numbering scheme? I thought we should all be using the official > kernel version NAME after the -final release? Was I mistaken? > > PS1 seems like somebody forgot to update it for 2.6.27... Cool, that means I get to do it :) thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/