Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757599AbYJQXdS (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Oct 2008 19:33:18 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754936AbYJQXdI (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Oct 2008 19:33:08 -0400 Received: from e32.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.150]:47538 "EHLO e32.co.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753635AbYJQXdG (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Oct 2008 19:33:06 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] OpenVZ kernel based checkpointing/restart From: Dave Hansen To: Andrey Mirkin Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, containers@lists.linux-foundation.org In-Reply-To: <1220439476-16465-1-git-send-email-major@openvz.org> References: <1220439476-16465-1-git-send-email-major@openvz.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 16:33:03 -0700 Message-Id: <1224286383.1848.65.camel@nimitz> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.3.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 882 Lines: 20 On Wed, 2008-09-03 at 14:57 +0400, Andrey Mirkin wrote: > This patchset introduces kernel based checkpointing/restart as it is > implemented in OpenVZ project. This patchset has limited functionality and > are able to checkpoint/restart only single process. Recently Oren Laaden > sent another kernel based implementation of checkpoint/restart. The main > differences between this patchset and Oren's patchset are: Hi Andrey, I'm curious what you want to happen with this patch set. Is there something specific in Oren's set that deficient which you need implemented? Are there some technical reasons you prefer this code? -- Dave -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/