Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S291591AbSBAHlB>; Fri, 1 Feb 2002 02:41:01 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S291590AbSBAHkw>; Fri, 1 Feb 2002 02:40:52 -0500
Received: from waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de ([129.217.4.42]:14731 "EHLO
	waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S291592AbSBAHkj>; Fri, 1 Feb 2002 02:40:39 -0500
Message-Id: <200201312044.g0VKi8tL001465@tigger.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
To: Richard Gooch <rgooch@ras.ucalgary.ca>
cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KERN_INFO for devfs 
In-Reply-To: Message from Richard Gooch <rgooch@ras.ucalgary.ca> 
   of "Wed, 30 Jan 2002 11:04:49 MST." <200201301804.g0UI4nQ13064@vindaloo.ras.ucalgary.ca> 
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 21:44:08 +0100
From: Horst von Brand <brand@jupiter.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Richard Gooch <rgooch@ras.ucalgary.ca> said:

[...]

> I'd prefer if tree maintainers (that means you, Alan:-) don't apply
> devfs patches that didn't come from me. I've already posted a patch
> which cleans up *all* the remaining printk()'s. In fact, it's a pair
> of patches, one for 2.4.x and one for 2.5.x. That was yesterday. Today
> I'm still seeing this thread being beaten to death.

There goes the "just small-stuff maintainer"...
-- 
Horst von Brand			     http://counter.li.org # 22616
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/