Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 1 Feb 2002 02:41:01 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 1 Feb 2002 02:40:51 -0500 Received: from waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de ([129.217.4.42]:14475 "EHLO waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 1 Feb 2002 02:40:37 -0500 Message-Id: <200201312226.g0VMQIKV001568@tigger.cs.uni-dortmund.de> To: Andrea Arcangeli cc: Momchil Velikov , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Radix tree page cache In-Reply-To: Message from Andrea Arcangeli of "Thu, 31 Jan 2002 03:25:40 +0100." <20020131032540.W1309@athlon.random> Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 23:26:18 +0100 From: Horst von Brand Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Andrea Arcangeli said: > On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 10:25:44PM +0200, Momchil Velikov wrote: > > Linus, > > > > Please, consider for inclusion in 2.5.3 series the following radix > > tree page cache patch. > > Please benchmark on files 10giga large, only do cached I/O (reads are > fine) between 9G and 10G offset for example. All published data I've seen on file size distribution on Unix show that the overwhelming mayority of files is a few KiB long, so this is a corner case. Why benchmark it expressly? -- Horst von Brand http://counter.li.org # 22616 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/