Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] iommu-2.6.git tree
From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
       joerg.roedel@amd.com, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@elte.hu,
       fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp, andreas.herrmann3@amd.com,
       joseph.cihula@intel.com, fenghua.yu@intel.com, jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org,
       tony.luck@intel.com, suresh.b.siddha@intel.com,
       torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org
In-Reply-To: <20081019024328.2cda973e.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
References: <1224343843.6770.1378.camel@macbook.infradead.org>
	 <20081019024328.2cda973e.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2008 16:51:37 +0100
Message-Id: <1224345097.6770.1389.camel@macbook.infradead.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 922
Lines: 22

On Sun, 2008-10-19 at 02:43 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Sure (I assume the "master" branch).

Yes. I don't use branches in public-facing repositories -- it's much
better just to have separate trees. 

>  However, I already have a tree in -next called iommu.  It is one of the 
> tip auto branches (auto-iommu-next) and is currently empty.  So do I name
> this one dwmw2-iommu, or has Ingo finished with the other one?

I believe the plan is that Ingo has finished with the other one and we
use the new one instead, yes.

-- 
David Woodhouse                            Open Source Technology Centre
David.Woodhouse@intel.com                              Intel Corporation

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/