Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751482AbYJRTrt (ORCPT ); Sat, 18 Oct 2008 15:47:49 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750879AbYJRTrl (ORCPT ); Sat, 18 Oct 2008 15:47:41 -0400 Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.182.187]:6743 "EHLO nf-out-0910.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750787AbYJRTrk (ORCPT ); Sat, 18 Oct 2008 15:47:40 -0400 Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2008 22:48:53 +0300 From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" To: Martin Michlmayr , Eric Sandeen , Tobias Frost , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, debian-arm@lists.debian.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com Subject: Re: XFS filesystem corruption on the arm(el) architecture Message-ID: <20081018194851.GA2083@localhost.localdomain> References: <1222893502.5020.40.camel@moria> <20081002004556.GB30001@disturbed> <48E4213E.9090508@sandeen.net> <20081016212500.GA27228@deprecation.cyrius.com> <48F7BC9F.4080909@sandeen.net> <20081017070109.GA30726@deprecation.cyrius.com> <20081017094615.GT4504@soziologie.ch> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ikeVEW9yuYc//A+q" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20081017094615.GT4504@soziologie.ch> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-29) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1670 Lines: 50 --ikeVEW9yuYc//A+q Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 11:46:15AM +0200, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote: > On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 09:01:09AM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > > * Eric Sandeen [2008-10-16 17:13]: > > > So is this a regression? did it used to work? If so, when? :) > >=20 > > The original report was with 2.6.18 but that was with the old ABI: > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D423562 > > I just installed a 2.6.22 kernel with EABI and I can also trigger > > the bug. So it's not a (recent) regression. >=20 > As far as I can remember (I only used old ABI arm) this is not a=20 > regression. XFS never worked on arm for me. You are wrong.=20 Our team have experience with XFS on ARM OABI on NAS. It worked fine on 2.6.12, but got broken on 2.6.17. http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D712 --=20 Regards, Kirill A. Shutemov + Belarus, Minsk + ALT Linux Team, http://www.altlinux.com/ --ikeVEW9yuYc//A+q Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkj6PaMACgkQbWYnhzC5v6r+NQCeNIhqvLMHizWqy2JUmZ0DHRqE 4OMAn0fGG3BBlfoOjv75tZwHdlLmmxeT =6Tsu -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ikeVEW9yuYc//A+q-- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/