Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753302AbYJTHnl (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Oct 2008 03:43:41 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751510AbYJTHnc (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Oct 2008 03:43:32 -0400 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([18.85.46.34]:53231 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750991AbYJTHnb (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Oct 2008 03:43:31 -0400 Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] iommu-2.6.git tree From: David Woodhouse To: Joerg Roedel Cc: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, fenghua.yu@intel.com, tony.luck@intel.com, suresh.b.siddha@intel.com, sfr@canb.auug.org.au, andreas.herrmann3@amd.com, joseph.cihula@intel.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org, tglx@linutronix.de, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, mingo@elte.hu In-Reply-To: <20081019211449.GG21841@8bytes.org> References: <1224343843.6770.1378.camel@macbook.infradead.org> <20081019111203.GB29705@8bytes.org> <1224415198.6770.1464.camel@macbook.infradead.org> <20081019211449.GG21841@8bytes.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 08:43:25 +0100 Message-Id: <1224488605.6770.1522.camel@macbook.infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.3.1 (2.22.3.1-1.fc9) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by bombadil.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1104 Lines: 25 On Sun, 2008-10-19 at 23:14 +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote: > This is a reason for a seperate Intel IOMMU tree which is pulled by > Linus. But I don't think that this is a reason to take over control of > all IOMMU development. I have no intention of taking over control of anything, if I can possibly avoid it. The _less_ patch-monkey work I have to do, the happier I'll be. There's more to life than Jon's patch statistics. I'm perfectly happy for Ingo to pull my tree into his, as I keep saying. As long as it gets into linux-next, that's fine. When I discussed it with Thomas a few weeks ago, he seemed to be suggesting that creating a new tree was the best thing to do, but I'm more than happy to adapt. -- David Woodhouse Open Source Technology Centre David.Woodhouse@intel.com Intel Corporation -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/