Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753895AbYJTHnz (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Oct 2008 03:43:55 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753053AbYJTHnh (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Oct 2008 03:43:37 -0400 Received: from mtaout01-winn.ispmail.ntl.com ([81.103.221.47]:58186 "EHLO mtaout01-winn.ispmail.ntl.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752760AbYJTHng (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Oct 2008 03:43:36 -0400 From: Ian Campbell To: Max Kellermann Cc: Glauber Costa , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Grant Coady , Trond Myklebust , "J. Bruce Fields" , Tom Tucker In-Reply-To: <20081020065149.GA11213@rabbit.intern.cm-ag> References: <20081017123207.GA14979@rabbit.intern.cm-ag> <20081017143301.GA18522@poweredge.glommer> <20081020065149.GA11213@rabbit.intern.cm-ag> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-lCQfIZjGGdEU9nFVE8qv" Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 08:43:23 +0100 Message-Id: <1224488603.23068.15.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.3.1 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 192.168.1.5 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ijc@hellion.org.uk Subject: Re: [PATCH] NFS regression in 2.6.26?, "task blocked for more than 120 seconds" X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Tue, 09 Jan 2007 17:23:22 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on hopkins.hellion.org.uk) X-Cloudmark-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=6OAc2UI1ETEA:10 a=Gm1qT94b7fUA:10 a=XoUB-yJnUyQWxTdTZ6oA:9 a=P7EKwNW0zaFCzbEVU6BR5Dqy2Q8A:4 a=LY0hPdMaydYA:10 a=5X-bIcuxxTv11fxI9xAA:9 a=QV9clJuH123qUD9a0zcInNr_Vr8A:4 a=rPt6xJ-oxjAA:10 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1545 Lines: 51 --=-lCQfIZjGGdEU9nFVE8qv Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 2008-10-20 at 08:51 +0200, Max Kellermann wrote: >=20 > On 2008/10/20 08:27, Ian Campbell wrote: > > The issue I see still occurs well before those changesets. I have > > seen it with v2.6.25 but v2.6.24 survived for 7 days without issue > > (my threshold for a good kernel is 7 days, hence bisecting is a bit > > slow...). >=20 > Hello Ian, >=20 > it seems we're hunting down different bugs after all. Too bad, I > hoped I could have solved your problem, too. Thanks anyway, I'll just keep on bisecting ;-) > Our machine has been > running well over the weekend with the patch I posted; with faulty > kernels, the problem would occur after a few minutes. >=20 --=20 Ian Campbell BOFH excuse #400: We are Microsoft. What you are experiencing is not a problem; it is an und= ocumented feature. --=-lCQfIZjGGdEU9nFVE8qv Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkj8NpsACgkQM0+0qS9rzVn4LwCgov3L6+AN7Oig4IRaa/9/efBt DmEAnR2mklOvtaF3yEWnM6PiEWbZfqDu =aXN0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-lCQfIZjGGdEU9nFVE8qv-- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/