Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752406AbYJTIlA (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Oct 2008 04:41:00 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750952AbYJTIkw (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Oct 2008 04:40:52 -0400 Received: from ti-out-0910.google.com ([209.85.142.186]:15593 "EHLO ti-out-0910.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750724AbYJTIkv (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Oct 2008 04:40:51 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=IVX6FFYrxZ2w3vH3yBlheiTO1VZY4NGmoYHxBmEaSF5fvB7yyg9DhQ9RblJwUuIAk1 B0HWvImYsi6lGzrtU5Kc/EG27u139JTrTOfS98SQY0sR0fXk8P7HS7VB0K3kiiAPUH+H FxKTe8Oxs1i9z0tDDSpFau3ZbcVFviWp3Fdg8= Message-ID: <2891419e0810200140s3cf9c0a3q228620519ae5f4af@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 17:40:49 +0900 From: "Dong-Jae Kang" To: "Ryo Tsuruta" Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] dm-ioband: I/O bandwidth controller v1.8.0: Introduction Cc: agk@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dm-devel@redhat.com, containers@lists.linux-foundation.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, fernando@oss.ntt.co.jp, corsetproject@googlegroups.com In-Reply-To: <20081017.160950.71109894.ryov@valinux.co.jp> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20081017.160950.71109894.ryov@valinux.co.jp> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2379 Lines: 67 Hi, Ryo Tsuruta I am trying to install your new released dm-ioband v1.8.0 I/O bandwidth controller v1.8.0 could be adjusted to the latest stable kernel 2.6.27.1 it was good news for me but, I had a problem when I try to patch bio-cgroup files to stable kernel 2.6.27.1 many patch failure and hunk messages were occured. Can you check bio-cgroup patch files against stable kernel 2.6.27.1? If the dm-ioband and bio-cgroup patches had different base kernel, i think it is not natural. I think it is more reasonable to release dm-ioband and bio-cgroup patches in pair. In my situation, both direct IO and buffered IO are same important. thank you Regard, Dong-Jae Kang 2008/10/17 Ryo Tsuruta : > Hi Alasdair and all, > > This is the dm-ioband version 1.8.0 release. > > Dm-ioband is an I/O bandwidth controller implemented as a device-mapper > driver, which gives specified bandwidth to each job running on the same > physical device. > > This release is a minor bug fix and confirmed running on the latest > stable kernel 2.6.27.1. > > - Can be applied to the kernel 2.6.27.1 and 2.6.27-rc5-mm1. > - Changes from 1.7.0 (posted on Oct 3, 2008): > - Fix a minor bug in io_limit setting that causes dm-ioband to stop > issuing I/O requests when a large value is set to io_limit. > > Alasdair, could you please review this patch and give me any comments? > > Thanks, > Ryo Tsuruta > _______________________________________________ > Containers mailing list > Containers@lists.linux-foundation.org > https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers > -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DONG-JAE, KANG Senior Member of Engineering Staff Internet Platform Research Dept, S/W Content Research Lab Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute(ETRI) 138 Gajeongno, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon, 305-700 KOREA Phone : 82-42-860-1561 Fax : 82-42-860-6699 Mobile : 82-10-9919-2353 E-mail : djkang@etri.re.kr (MSN) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/