Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753672AbYJTMP2 (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Oct 2008 08:15:28 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751246AbYJTMPK (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Oct 2008 08:15:10 -0400 Received: from mailhub.sw.ru ([195.214.232.25]:16967 "EHLO relay.sw.ru" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751519AbYJTMPJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Oct 2008 08:15:09 -0400 From: Andrey Mirkin To: devel@openvz.org Subject: Re: [Devel] Re: [PATCH 0/9] OpenVZ kernel based checkpointing/restart Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 16:14:35 +0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 Cc: Dave Hansen , Pavel Emelyanov , containers@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <1220439476-16465-1-git-send-email-major@openvz.org> <1224286383.1848.65.camel@nimitz> In-Reply-To: <1224286383.1848.65.camel@nimitz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200810201614.36911.major@openvz.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1405 Lines: 29 On Saturday 18 October 2008 03:33 Dave Hansen wrote: > On Wed, 2008-09-03 at 14:57 +0400, Andrey Mirkin wrote: > > This patchset introduces kernel based checkpointing/restart as it is > > implemented in OpenVZ project. This patchset has limited functionality > > and are able to checkpoint/restart only single process. Recently Oren > > Laaden sent another kernel based implementation of checkpoint/restart. > > The main differences between this patchset and Oren's patchset are: > > Hi Andrey, > > I'm curious what you want to happen with this patch set. Is there > something specific in Oren's set that deficient which you need > implemented? Are there some technical reasons you prefer this code? Hi Dave, Right now my patchset (v2) provides an ability to checkpoint and restart a group of processes. The process of checkpointing and restart can be initiated from external process (not from the process which should be checkpointed). Also I think that all the restart job (including process forking) should be done in kernel, as in this case we will not depend on user space and will be more secure. This is also implemented in my patchset. Andrey -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/