Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] OpenVZ kernel based checkpointing/restart
From: Dave Hansen <dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Louis.Rilling@kerlabs.com
Cc: containers@lists.linux-foundation.org, Andrey Mirkin <major@openvz.org>,
       linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
In-Reply-To: <20081020111002.GQ15171@hawkmoon.kerlabs.com>
References: <1220439476-16465-1-git-send-email-major@openvz.org>
	 <1224286383.1848.65.camel@nimitz>
	 <20081020111002.GQ15171@hawkmoon.kerlabs.com>
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 09:36:16 -0700
Message-Id: <1224520576.1848.102.camel@nimitz>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 954
Lines: 21

On Mon, 2008-10-20 at 13:10 +0200, Louis Rilling wrote:
> To be fair, and since (IIRC) the initial intent was to start with OpenVZ's
> approach, shouldn't Oren answer the same questions with respect to Andrey's
> patchset?

I'm only really "supporting" Oren's patch set because he got it out way
before the OpenVZ one showed up, and has kept integrating improvements
into it to keep me interested.  The OpenVZ approach does a few things
that Oren's does not, and it *is* a bit more mature.

I'm quite willing to jump camps if there's something compelling in what
Andrey has posted, even though I've put quite a bit of time in to
reviewing and improving Oren's.  I'm looking for that "something". :)

-- Dave

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/