Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 1 Feb 2002 06:15:13 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 1 Feb 2002 06:14:55 -0500 Received: from astound-64-85-224-253.ca.astound.net ([64.85.224.253]:46605 "EHLO master.linux-ide.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 1 Feb 2002 06:14:37 -0500 Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2002 03:06:20 -0800 (PST) From: Andre Hedrick To: Alexander Viro cc: Kris Urquhart , "'Andreas Dilger'" , "'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org'" Subject: Re: false positives on disk change checks In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 31 Jan 2002, Alexander Viro wrote: > > > On Thu, 31 Jan 2002, Kris Urquhart wrote: > > > No patches - linux-2.4.17 right off of www.linux.org. > > > > The chipset is an ALI 1487/1489. > > The disk itself is a JUMPtec DISKchip with a SanDisk 20-99-00024-1 on it. > > > > The relevant lines from dmesg are: > > Uniform Multi-Platform E-IDE driver Revision: 6.31 > > ide: Assuming 50MHz system bus speed for PIO modes; override with idebus=xx > > hda: SunDisk SDTB-128, ATA DISK drive > > ide0 at 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6 on irq 14 > > hda: 31360 sectors (16 MB) w/1KiB Cache, CHS=490/2/32 > > Partition check: > > hda: hda1 hda2 hda3 > > > > % cat /proc/ide/driver > > ide-disk version 1.10 > > > > There is a CONFIG_BLK_DEV_ALI14XX, but apparently it only turns on > > support for the second channel. I tried it anyway (along with the > > ide0=ali14xx boot parameter), but the disk was then not recognized > > at boot time (busy/timeout during partition check). A google search > > did not turn up any problems with ali14xx.c since 2.0. > > Andre, looks like setup above gives false positives on disk change check... What do you expect w/ removable media. Obivious it has to be reporting an media status event change. Gawd knows where I could find a copy of the hardware to verify. If it puts a patch of mine on it and it is still present there is a problem, if it goes away with the patch, the kernel should take the patch. Regards, Andre Hedrick Linux Disk Certification Project Linux ATA Development - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/