Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754246AbYJTSvw (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Oct 2008 14:51:52 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751352AbYJTSvo (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Oct 2008 14:51:44 -0400 Received: from e32.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.150]:58702 "EHLO e32.co.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751901AbYJTSvo (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Oct 2008 14:51:44 -0400 Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 13:51:30 -0500 From: "Serge E. Hallyn" To: David Howells Cc: James Morris , Stephen Rothwell , lkml , "Eric W. Biederman" , Michael Halcrow Subject: Re: [PATCH] User namespaces: set of cleanups (eventually for linux-next?) Message-ID: <20081020185130.GA21054@us.ibm.com> References: <20081016224641.GA17413@us.ibm.com> <758.1224201299@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <758.1224201299@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17+20080114 (2008-01-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1523 Lines: 43 Quoting David Howells (dhowells@redhat.com): > > Serge E. Hallyn wrote: > > > David, since this consumes your patch, I wasn't sure whether it was > > appropriate to put your signed-off-by on here or not. I decided > > doing so was the worse of the potential offenses... > > The way I think I'd've done it is to include my patch description and > signed-off-by then list your additional changes (just keep on incrementing the > point numbers) and your signed-off-by. > > > - new_user = alloc_uid(current->nsproxy->user_ns, new->uid); > > + new_user = alloc_uid(current_user()->user_ns, new->uid); > > That should be current_user_ns() rather than current_user()->user_ns. I made > this change before adding the macro. Ok, will change. > > + key_put(new->thread_keyring); > > + new->thread_keyring = NULL; > > Superfluous. copy_creds() does this immediately upon return. Oops, will drop. > Also, in copy_creds(), should the session and process keyrings be discarded if > CLONE_NEWUSER is set? Actually, I think that should be dealt with by a patch > to deal with namespacing keyrings as the user-default keyrings need to be > namespaced rather than here. > > David Oh, yeah, that's going to have to be a separate patch I guess... thanks, -serge -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/