Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S291718AbSBALln>; Fri, 1 Feb 2002 06:41:43 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S291722AbSBALld>; Fri, 1 Feb 2002 06:41:33 -0500
Received: from mx2.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:16539 "HELO mx2.elte.hu")
	by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id <S291719AbSBALl2>;
	Fri, 1 Feb 2002 06:41:28 -0500
Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2002 14:38:13 +0100 (CET)
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Reply-To: <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Martin Dalecki <dalecki@evision-ventures.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
Subject: Re: A modest proposal -- We need a patch penguin
In-Reply-To: <3C56A03C.9070107@evision-ventures.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0202011437270.8190-100000@localhost.localdomain>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org


On Tue, 29 Jan 2002, Martin Dalecki wrote:

> >tell Jens. He goes about fixing it all, not just the most visible pieces
> >that showed how much the Linux block IO code sucked. And guess what? His
> >patches are being accepted, and the Linux 2.5 block IO code is evolving
> >rapidly. Sometimes keeping broken code around as an incentive to fix it
> >*for real* is better than trying to massage the broken code somewhat.
> >

> There is nothing easier to fix then this. You just have to grep for
> it, or just remove the declaration and wait to be hit by this during
> the compilation. [...]

you have completely and totally ignored my argument.

	Ingo

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/